Categorized | General

It is not just the ridiculing references to religion that should be seriously

Posted on 06 October 2010

It is not just the ridiculing references to religion that should be seriously curtailed, but all of them. Rather than woozily contemplating matters beyond our ken, we might all usefully turn our attention to the here and now.The Culture Secretary, Tessa Jowell, has been setting a good example here with her breezily secular Christmas card, featuring ethnic dancers, a TV set, a train and the word “goal”, which has so enraged huffy columnists with CARist sympathies. Christians, says Mr Hibbert, have become “a convenient target of easy ridicule by lazy journalists and uninspired advertising executives across the country.”As a lazy journalist, I shall be supporting this cause, if for different reasons than those of the CAR community. This month a man called Clive Hibbert has established Christians Against Ridicule, an organisation that will campaign against “the abuse and blasphemy that masquerades as art, entertainment and social commentary today”. A culture that becomes obsessed with spirituality is not far from slipping into the humourless, censorship-happy stupidity of Bible-belt America.In fact, the signs are already there.

As a non-believer, I am quite happy for religious leaders to contribute to debates on public issues, even if the Archbishop of Canterbury’s publicity department refuse to allow his views on the Iraq war to be publicly broadcast, but perhaps the message for 2004 to writers, politicians and producers should be to leave these things to hard-core believers. The two main theatrical events of last week, David Almond’s Skellig and Stephen Berkoff’s Messiah, reflected our new enthusiasm for spiritual matters, one celebrating it, the other mocking it. Next month, the heavy battalions go into battle with the National Theatre adaptation of Philip Pullman’s mighty trilogy His Dark Materials, a story preoccupied by the connection between belief and the established church.Elsewhere, the Lord is playing a more light-hearted role. In Jerry Springer – the Opera, Jesus appears as a petulant guest on a Springer show taking place in hell.

Salley Vickers’ novel Mr Golightly’s Holiday has him visiting Widdecombe in disguise, while in the film Bruce Almighty – described by its director as “a love story dealing with God’s love” – Jim Carrey takes over the job of creator for a week.Enough, surely This preoccupation with religion is getting out of hand. Under these circumstances, the appearance of His name on the seat of a pair of jeans should surely be considered as no more than advertising.But something odd, and out of national character, has recently been happening. The British are, in one way or another, becoming hung up on religion. As Catholic countries grow more secular – the French, Spaniards and Italians will have no problem in buying Jesus clothes – we, with a new and dangerous light in our eyes, are heading in the opposite direction.So not only does the God slot continue to run at peak time on Radio 4 and a rather interesting series on religion and politics appears on TV, but some of our slyer politicians have taken to attaching, albeit in a shifty, sub-textual way, a religious tag to their weightier pronouncements.The entertainment media happily play along.

These days, it is entirely appropriate that Christmas should be an orgy of consumerism and profit – after all, over the last century, Christianity has largely become the spiritual wing of capitalism. Every day throughout this month, private companies across the world will be making billions out of the religious festival of Christmas.Although 2,000 or so years ago, there was that whole business in the temple, overturning the tables of the moneylenders and the seats of those selling doves, it seems that we have moved on since then. In the view of “any right-thinking member of the public”, it says, the idea of Jesus jeans is “contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality” and likely to cause “greater offence than mere distaste to a significant section of the general public”.As is almost always the case when the moral sensibilities of right-thinking members of the public are invoked, the conclusion reached by the Patent Office is twaddle. The Patent Office has just denied a clothes company called Rowland Buerlen the opportunity to register the name “Jesus” as a trademark for items of clothing.

This post was written by:

admin - who has written 786 posts on Megaman Community.


Contact the author

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Next Articles

Information